Comparison between two supraglottic devices in gynaecological surgeries

A Comparative study of Baska mask and i-gel in patients undergoing Elective Gynaecological Surgery

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/03/012563

Enrollment

Registered

2018-03-15

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- In Patients undergoing elective gynecological surgeries

Interventions

Intervention1: Baska mask: This study aims at comparing Baska mask with i-gel in terms of oropharyngeal seal pressure (OSP), duration of insertion, success rates of insertion, ease of insertion, phary

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.ASA physical status I-III 2.Age >= 18 years 3.Fasting more than 6 hours 4.BMI 5.Surgery duration

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Refusal to consent 2.Patients with anticipated difficult airway 3.Risk of aspiration of gastric contents (Pregnancy, full stomach, hiatus hernia) 4.Surgery requiring tracheal intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare oropharyngeal seal pressure of the two devicesTimepoint: postinduction, after recovery and 4 hours after anaesthesia recovery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1.Insertion time 2.Rate of first time successful placement of the devices 3.Number of attempts for insertion of device 4.Ease of insertion 5.Pharyngolaryngeal morbidity 6.Other adverse effects like dysphagia, sore throat Timepoint: 1.At the time of insertion 2.At the end of surgery 3.30 minutes post operative 4.Four hours post opertaive	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrAnjeleena Kumar Gupta

Sir Ganga Ram Hospital

anjeleenasgrh@gmail.com9818422867

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026