Skip to content

Effect of intubation through ILMA on vital parameters and its comparison with that of conventional intubation

A Comparative Study of the Pressor Response to Conventional Laryngoscopic Intubation and Intubation through the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/03/012493
Enrollment
80
Registered
2018-03-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA Grade 1 and 2 patients Health Condition 2: Z768- Persons encountering health services in other specified circumstances

Interventions

Intervention1: Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway: First generation LMA with facility of intubation through the device Control Intervention1: Macintosh Laryngoscope: Conventional direct laryngscopy

Sponsors

ESIGIMSR Andheri
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia Age 18 to 60 yrs ASA grade I and II Mallampati grade I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of gastro-esophageal reflex disease Patients with uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes Patients with Cardio respiratory and cerebrovascular disease. Mallampati grade III and IV Anticipated difficult intubation Pregnant patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The pressor response to conventional laryngoscopic intubation and intubation through the ILMA Timepoint: HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP Before induction baseline values At the time of device insertion. At the time of intubation 1 3 5 and 10 minutes after intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The time taken for intubation in between the two groups and the effect of duration of intubation and the number of attempts on the pressor responses to be measured. The number of attempts required for successful intubation in both the groups.Timepoint: Intubation time which is from the termination of manual ventilation using a facemask to restart of ventilation through ETT. Number of attempts required for intubation.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactTANUMOY MAULICK

ESIPGIMSR Andheri

drsandhyagujar@gmail.com9869074329

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026