Study which makes use of two different devices for placement of a tube to control breathing during anaesthesia

Comparison of King Vision and C-MAC videolaryngoscopes for intubation in adults

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/03/012448

Enrollment

Registered

2018-03-09

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patients without any co-morbid conditions

Interventions

Intervention1: King-vision videolaryngoscope: King-vision videolaryngoscope will be used for endotracheal intubation Control Intervention1: C-Mac videolaryngoscope: C-Mac videolaryngoscope will be use

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grade I and II Mallampatti grade I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Mallampatti grade >= III BMI >30kg/m2 Thyromental distance Inter incisor distance Reduced neck extension Cervical spine instability Risk of pulmonary aspiration Pregnancy Oro-pharyngeal pathology Facial abnormalities

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the time for successful intubation with King Vision and C-MAC videolaryngoscopes.Timepoint: At the end of endotracheal intubation following induction of general anaesthesia	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare theglottis view, number of attempts, first-attempt success rate and proportion of successful intubation with King Vision and C-MAC videolaryngoscopesTimepoint: At end of endotracheal intubation following induction of general anaesthesia	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactTejesh CA

MS Ramaiah Medical College

drtejeshca@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026