Skip to content

Influence of tibial bowing on prothesis placement, surgical technique and outcome in total knee replacement in laterally bowed knees as compared to isolated deformity in the joint.

Influence of metaphyseal tibia vara on component placement, gap balancing and outcome in total knee replacement in varus knees as compared to isolated intra articular deformity

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/03/012442
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-03-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- arthritis knee

Interventions

Intervention1: bowed tibia group: Patients with bowed tibia were taken. Tibia was considered bowed if the tibial anatomical axis (distal tibial middiaphyseal line starting from the center of the talu

Sponsors

no
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients undergoing TKR were assessed with alignment radiographs during the study period .Patients with varus bowed tibia were taken.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. No informed consent signed or not willing to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To document the changes in surgical techniques required during surgery and the radiological and functional outcome in knees with MTV as compared to isolated intra articular varus.Timepoint: At one month follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
we assessed all the patients for functional outcome with modified knee society score (MKSS), range of movements (ROM) and functional score (FS).Timepoint: 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMITHUN MANOHAR M

Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd

manoharmithun@gmail.com9952701527

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026