FindTrial
Sign In

fixed functional appliance in growing versus non growing age

To compare the therapeutic effect of molar to molar fixed functional appliance in class II malocclusion at different stage of skeletal maturity

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/03/012423
Enrollment
24
Registered
2018-03-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Molar to Molar fixed functional appliance : Molar to Molar fixed functional appliance Control Intervention1: NIL: NIL

Sponsors

Dr Shivani Mathur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria- 1.Skeletal and dental class II malocclusion due to retrognathic mandible 2.Normal- horizontal growth pattern 3.Age criteria 12-20 years and CVMI stage 2-6 4.Absence of any developmental anomaly

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria 1.Extracted or Missing teeth 2.Presence of gingival disease 3.Mentally challenged patientâ?? 4.Patient with any know systemic disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Skeletal and Dental changesTimepoint: 8 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To see the result of fixed functional in late CVMI stageTimepoint: 8 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pradeep Raghav

Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University

drpradeepraghav@gmail.com09837175914

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026