Skip to content

A study to find the quality of dental filling placed by two different techniques

clinical evaluation of proximal contacts in class II composite resin restorations placed by two different matrix techniques

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/03/012412
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-03-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Class II Dental Caries Health Condition 2: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Sectional matrix retainer system: Class II composite restoration with Palodent V3 matrix retainer system Control Intervention1: Tofflemaire matrix retainer system: Dental Class II compo

Sponsors

Dr T Rambabu
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Class II dental caries 2. Adjacent and opposing teeth should be present 3. Buccolingual width of restoration should not be more than 6mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Poor periodontal condition 2. Allergic to composite restorative material

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Tightness of the contact evaluated by ultrathin metal matrix band.Timepoint: 1 hour

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
No Food lodgement in-between the restored and adjacent teethTimepoint: 1 week

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr T Rambabu

Vishnu dental college

rambabumds@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026