Skip to content

Effect of spine mobilization with nerve movement versus effect of spine mobilisation with arm movement

Effect of neurodynamic SNAGs versus spinal mobilization with arm movements in subjects with cervical radicupathy:A randomized clinical trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/03/012352
Enrollment
36
Registered
2018-03-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Cervical radiculopathy

Interventions

Intervention1: Group A(neurodynamic SNAGs group) given for 6 days: Subjects in sitting position ,therapist delivered the snags on affected vertebrae with keeping affected upper limb in neurodynamic te

Sponsors

Kle institute of Physiotherapy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.radiating pain from neck to upper limb more than 3 weeks with(any of the 3 positive)spurling test,cervical distraction test, ipsilateral side rotation less than 60 degrees, positive upper limb neurodynamic test(ULTT) 2.subjects willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VAS,NDI, cervical range of motionTimepoint: VAS,NDI, cervical range of motion will be assessed at first day before enrollment in the study and then after 6 sessions of intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
VAS,NDI and cervical ROMTimepoint: It was assessed at the time of enrollment and then after 6 sessions of intervention

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShivani Dilip kurode

Kle institute of Physiotherapy,belgavi

anandhegs@yahoo.co.in9945282896

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026