FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the effect of three new materials for the treatment of deep cavities.

Comparative evaluation of indirect pulp capping in young permanent teeth using three different materials : A randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/02/012223
Enrollment
60
Registered
2018-02-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- patients with deep dentinal caries

Interventions

Intervention1: Biodentine: Tricalcium silicate, dicalcium silicate, calcium carbonate and oxide filler, iron oxide shade, and zirconium oxide. Intervention2: Three Mixtatin: Three Mixtatin-(100mg cipr

Sponsors

Bushra Rahman
Lead Sponsor
bushra rahman
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: INCLUSION CRITERIA Clinically: 1.Patients with complete physical and mental wellbeing. 2.Permanent premolars and molars with deep dentinal caries. 3.Teeth with sensitivity to cold. 4.Positive pulp vitality on cold pulp testing Radiographically 1.More than 70% or 2/3rd involvement of dentin thickness 2.Absence of periapical pathology. EXCLUSION CRITERIA Clinically: 1.History of spontaneous pain 2.Tenderness on palpation or percussion 3.Pathologic mobility of the tooth 4. Swelling of vestibule in relation to the tooth 5.Draining sinus tract in relation to the tooth. Radiographically 1.Pathologic external/internal resorption 2.Furcation involvement 3.Calcifications within pulp

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Clinically: • History of spontaneous pain • Tenderness on palpation or percussion • Pathologic mobility of the tooth • Swelling of vestibule in relation to the tooth • Draining sinus tract in relation to the tooth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
RESULT ANALYSIS CRITERIA Clinical evaluation: Presence of 1.Sensitivity 2.Pain 3.Swelling 4.Sinus tract Radiographic evaluation: Presence of 1.External or internal resorption of tooth 2.Pulp involvement 3.PDL widening 4.Periapical involvement 5.Young permanent teeth showing absence of root apex development 6. Pathologic external / internal root resorption Timepoint: RESULT ANALYSIS CRITERIA Clinical evaluation: Presence of 1.Sensitivity 2.Pain 3.Swelling 4.Sinus tract Radiographic evaluation: Presence of 1.External or internal resorption of tooth 2.Pulp involvement 3.PDL widening 4.Periapical involvement 5.Young permanent teeth showing absence of root apex development 6. Pathologic external / internal root resorption—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mousumi Goswami

I.T.S Dental College Hospital & Research Centre

mousumi_leo@yahoo.co.in08588854190

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026