FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare the ease of viewing the larynx and intubation with 3 different types of instruments

A prospective randomized study to compare the ease of tracheal intubation using Truview, Airtraq and MacIntosh laryngoscopic blades in patients undergoing ENT surgeries

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/02/012067
Enrollment
90
Registered
2018-02-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA I or II patients presenting for surgery requiring general anesthesia Health Condition 2: H60-H95- Diseases of the ear and mastoid process

Interventions

Intervention1: Airtraq videolaryngoscope: It is a newer advancement in laryngoscopic blades Intervention2: Truview laryngoscope: It is also one of the newer advances in laryngoscopic blades Control I

Sponsors

KEM Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients aged more than 18 years ASA I or II Patients undergoing elective surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal ASA III, IV, V Patients requiring awake intubation Airway distortion or trauma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Intubation difficulty score 2.Duration of tracheal intubation 3.Hemodynamic responses 4.Complications Timepoint: During intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pulse and Mean arterial pressure changes to intubation and Complications Timepoint: During intubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Prajwala S K

King Edward Memorial Hospital

shrikanta_oak@yahoo.com9324134023

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026