Skip to content

effect of dexmedetomidine with different induction agents on smooth initiation of anesthesia and better cardiovascular stability during intubation.

Effect of Dexmedetomidine on induction and hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation with Propofol and Sevoflurane - EDIHLIPS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/02/012009
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-02-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA I &II patients posted for elective surgeries under general anesthesia

Interventions

Intervention1: inj dexmedetomidien 1mcg/kg infusion and inj propofol: On arrival in the operating room, the patients baseline heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation (SpO 2) will be recorded

Sponsors

none
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.ASA I or II (no or minimal co-morbid disease) 2.Patients scheduled for elective surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.History of allergy or contraindications study drug 2.Concomitant use of medications which may exaggerate the heart rate response of Dexmedetomidine including digoxin or ß-adrenergic antagonists. 3.Predicted difficulty in intubation, 4.pregnant patients 5.nursing women 6.morbid obesity 7.Coronary artery disease 8.ischemic heart disease 9.heart blocks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary objective: 1.To compare the Mean Arterial Pressure and Heart Rate response to induction with Propofol and Sevoflurane after dexmedetomidine 1 ? g/kg IV infusion. 2.To compare effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine 1 ? g/kg with propofol and Dexmedetomidine 1 ? g/kg with sevoflurane in attenuating cardiovascular response during laryngoscopy and intubationTimepoint: 1. 5min after settling in OT 2. 2 min after administration of drug, 3.1min after induction and 4.at 1, 3, 5 and 10 min after intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary objective: To compare time of induction and smoothness of inductionTimepoint: The time of start of injection of propofol or mask placement with sevoflurane 8% was considered as ‘starting point of induction’. The patients were asked every 5 seconds, to open the eyes and loss of response to this command was defined as loss of verbal contact. Eyelash reflex will be then checked for additional confirmation of loss of consciousness which is defined as ‘induction end point’. The time taken for anesthetic induction will be recorded for both groups

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Navya C N

Sri MuthuKumaran Medical College, Hospital And Research Institute,

drcn.navya@gmail.com9791793965

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026