Compare the safety of newer supra glottic device baska mask with i-gel

Comparison of BaskaÂ® Mask versus I-gel for minor surgical procedures under general anaesthesia

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/02/011965

Enrollment

Registered

2018-02-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA I II

Interventions

Intervention1: supra glottic airway device: Baska mask, I-gel Intervention2: supraglottic airway device insertion: Baska Mask, I-gel Intervention3: Baska Mask: Supraglottic airway device Intervention4

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologistsâ??physical status I and II who underwent minor surgical procedures ( duration < 60 minutes) under general anaesthesia. Patients who underwent elective surgical procedures with fasting period of 6 hours and Mallampati I,II or III.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with neck pathology, anticipated difficult airway, pregnant women, increased risk of aspiration, mouth opening 30 kg.m-2

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
First time success rate %Timepoint: successful placement of the device	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time of insertion of the device Sealing pressure Ease of insertion of gastric tubeTimepoint: After successful placement of the device	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRoopa Sachidananda

KIMS Hubli

ssafiya11@yahoo.com9448861706

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026