FindTrial
Sign In

comparison between tissue adhesive and suturing technique for wound closure after impacted lower wisdom tooth removal

comparison of the efficacy between tissue adhesive and standard suturing for flap closure after impacted mandibular third molar odontectomy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/02/011957
Enrollment
100
Registered
2018-02-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- impacted mandibular third molar

Interventions

Intervention1: N-butyl 2 cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive: following the disimpaction , the flap will be closed with N butyl 2 cyanoacrylate in group 1 and patient will be evaluated on 1st 3rd 7th 15th d

Sponsors

Dr sajeesh Raj A
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Impacted mandibular third molar with complete flap coverage no history of pericoronitis and previous infection patients with adequate mouth opening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: chronic smokers allergic to drugs or anesthetic agents poor oral hygiene patients lost to follow up patients under oral contraceptives patients under radiotherapy or chemotherapy diabetic patients patients on immunosuppressants

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
comparison of postoperative bleeding, pain, wound dehiscence and wound healingTimepoint: 2 years—

Primary

MeasureTime frame
comparison between the efficacy between the tissue adhesive and standard suturingTimepoint: 2 years—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Adarsh S Indra

coorg institute of dental sciences

adarshsindra@gmail.com9895258147

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026