FindTrial
Sign In

Visualisation to put in tube for General Anesthesia using three different equipments

Efficacy of Cormack Lehane grading for intubation difficulty with three different videolaryngoscopes in comparison with macintosh laryngoscope: A Prospective randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/02/011806
Enrollment
360
Registered
2018-02-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 2: null- Patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia

Interventions

Intervention1: Airtraq: Type of Videolaryngoscope Intervention2: MacGrath: Type of non channelled videolaryngoscope Intervention3: C MAC: Another type of non channelled videolaryngoscope Control Inter

Sponsors

NIMS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Physical status – I, II and III Age: 18- 70 Elective surgery General Anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pediatric cases Emergency Anticipated rapid desaturation Mouth opening less than 3 cm Procedures under spontaneous ventilation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to evaluate the use of cormack lehane grading and intubation difficulty scores for assessment of intubation difficulty in three different videolaryngoscopes in comparison with direct laryngoscope.Timepoint: At the time of intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of intubation Time taken for intubationTimepoint: At the time of intubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kavitha

Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences

drkarunya@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026