Health Condition 1: null- Adequacy of ventilation provided by air-Q VS ProSeal LMA in Children undergoing ophthalmic procedures
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: air-Q: Comparing efficacy of ProSeal with air-Q for features of adequate ventilation and stability in the same
Control Intervention1: ProSeal LMA: ProSeal LMA has certain features that
Sponsors
Department of Anesthesiology Pain medicine and Critical Care AIIMS New Delhi
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA I and II Planned for elective Ophthalmic operation
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Refusal of childâ??s parental/LAR consent to participate in the study Suspected or known difficult airway Active infection in the respiratory tract Lung disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To assess the Oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q® when compared to ProSealTM LMA Timepoint: Measured 5 minutes after successful confirmation of effective ventilation | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| - Time to insert SAD - Number of attempts - Hemodynamic response after insertion - Post-operative laryngospasm - Post-operative desaturationTimepoint: Hemodynamic parameters measured at 0 min ( after entry into operation theatre) before insertion and 3 min after successful confirmation of adequate ventilation. | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactJoel Jasiel G
All India Institute of Medical sciences
Outcome results
None listed