Comparision of two intravenous induction drugs on quality of intraoral device insertion, pulse, BP chnges and recovery

Clinical comparision of ketofol(ketamine and propofol admixture)versus propofol on quality of I-gel insertion, hemodynamic stability and recovery

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2018/01/011630

Enrollment

100

Registered

2018-01-31

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Ameican society of anesthesiologist grade I,II,III grades

Interventions

Intervention1: comparing I gel insertion condition: Group P: Intravenous Inj. Propofol 2.5mg/kg Group KP: Intravenous Inj. Ketamine 1mg/kg and propofol 2mg/kg. Injected drug will be prepared in 20

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA grade I-IV 2. Patients who required general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ASA status V 2. Hypersensitivity reaction to study drug, soyabean oil, glycerol, egg lecithin 3. Pregnant or lactating patients 4. Neonates and infants 5. Patients with history of neurologic and psychiatric diseases 6. Difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Overall insertion conditions â?? excellent / satisfactory / poorTimepoint: Appropriate size I gel or LMA will be inserted after loss of consciousness and eye lid reflex. Assessments will be done only for the first attempt. duration five minutes.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
observing hemodynamic parameters, recovery and complicationsTimepoint: observation till end of surgery. duration of 60minutes.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Smita R Engineer

B.J.Medical College, Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad

seng_90@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026