Skip to content

Use of Knotted Floss Technique in wide interdental areas

Comparative Evaluation of the Plaque Removal Efficacy and Patient Acceptability of the Knotted Floss Technique with Conventional Flossing Technique and Interdental Brushing in Type II Gingival Embrasures â?? A Clinical Crossover Study - KF-2

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/01/011554
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-01-24
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Knotted floss technique: The subjects will use the knotted floss technique. In this modification of conventional flossing technique, a knot is tied in the floss at any distance in the m

Sponsors

Dr Aaron F Gomes
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria: 1. have one Type II gingival embrasure in the premolar first molar area. 2. full mouth Plaque Index score >=1.8 (Silness and Loe 1964) 3. full mouth Gingival Index >= 1.0 (Loe and Silness 1963) 4. good general health, 5. have all teeth present in quadrant being tested and opposing quadrant 6. be available for a 16 week study period, 7. be ready to abide with the study criteria, 8. minimum education of grade 12

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion Criteria: 1. have used in previous 2months oral hygiene aids other than tooth-brushing like dental flossing, mouthwashes and water jet irrigating systems 2. habit of unilateral mastication for >=2 months, 3. medical history of diabetes mellitus, hepatitis, pregnancy or requiring any antibiotic prophylaxis, 4. having drug history in preceding two months of use of antibiotics, hormonal supplements, steroids, non steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, oral contraceptives or any drug that influence gingival tissue, 5. taking part in any other clinical or drug trial including taking part in other study groups related to the evaluation of knotted floss technique, 6. having physical handicap limiting the ability for oral hygiene and effective use of dental floss, 7. had orthodontic treatment 8. having gross dental caries 9. having advanced periodontitis (more than one pocket >= 6mm), 10. had active periodontal treatment like scaling, root planing, curettage, periodontal surgery in the previous 8weeks, 11. had any adverse oral habit like smoking, tobacco chewing or habits of self gingival mutilation, 12. had history of trauma or surgery to the jaws. 13. teeth adjacent to the embrasure area selected are having proximal caries or gross occlusal caries, or having proximal restorations, crowns, onlays or inlays.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rustogi modification of Navy Plaque IndexTimepoint: 1) Baseline (0 day) 2) 2 weeks 3) 4 weeks [all subjects in each intervention/treatment phase]

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Barnett Modified Papillary Bleeding IndexTimepoint: 1) Baseline (0 day) 2) 2 weeks 3) 4 weeks [all subjects in each intervention/treatment phase];Gingival Trauma Index by Carter-Hanson et al method 1996Timepoint: 1) Baseline (0 day) 2) 2 weeks 3) 4 weeks [all subjects in each intervention/treatment phase];Lobene Modified Gingival IndexTimepoint: 1) Baseline (0 day) 2) 2 weeks 3) 4 weeks [all subjects in each intervention/treatment phase]

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAaron F Gomes

Uttaranchal Dental and Medical Research Institute

aarongomes@hotmail.com00919860597402

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026