FindTrial
Sign In

Gum surgery and scanning of gums

Microsurgical and conventional flap debridement: comparison of gingival perfusion status using ultrasound color doppler

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/01/011469
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-01-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Chronic generalised periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: 1.Microsurgical periodontal flap surgery: After giving local anesthesia, microsurgery was carried out with x2.5 optical magnification dental loupe. After local anesthesia, sulcular inci

Sponsors

self
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Both males and females of 30 â?? 50 yrs of age limit with same level of horizontal boneloss and probing pocket depth more than or equal to 5mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients using antibiotics 6 months before with systemic diseases like diabetes mellitus connective disorders ,kidney, liver and neurological disorders, smokers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare gingival perfusion status and early healing after microsurgical and conventional flap debridement among study populationTimepoint: Baseline, 3rd day, 7th dayand 14th day—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Early healing index Gingival recession Plaque index Modified sulcular bleeding index Gingival margin level Clinical attachment level Probing pocket depth Relative attachment level Ultrasound color Doppler to monitor the gingival perfusion statusTimepoint: 1st and 2nd week 3months 3rd day, 7th and 14th day—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBVRamesh Reddy

Narayana dental college and hospital

perioramesh@yahoo.co.in9849798990

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026