Skip to content

Effect of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy and Mirror Therapy on Hand Function in Stroke Patients.

A Study to Find Out Effectiveness of Constraint Induced Movement Therapy along with Mirror Therapy for Improvement of Hand Function in Subacute Stroke Phase

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/01/011376
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-01-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I679- Cerebrovascular disease, unspecified Health Condition 2: null- Stroke

Interventions

Intervention1: Group A - Experimental Group: The experimental group received Conventional Neurorehabilitation, Mirror Therapy and Constraint Induced Movement Therapy for a 2 weeks duration Control Int

Sponsors

Dr Jyoti S Jeevannavar
Lead Sponsor
Prashant Mukkannavar
Collaborator
Priya Rajendra Pawar
Collaborator
Swathi P
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Persons who experienced an incident stroke within 3 to 9 months prior to enrollment in the study. 2. Patients with a spasticity of Grade 2 on Modified Ashworth Scale. 3. Patients with an ability to perform minimum 20 degrees active extension at the wrist, 10 degrees of active finger extension, and 10 degrees of thumb abduction/extension. 4. Patients with minimal sensory or cognitive deficits were included for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Persons with a history of stroke due to head injury or any traumatic condition one year prior to stroke. 2. Persons were excluded from participating in the study if they suffered from associated problems such as global aphasia, cognitive impairment, epilepsy and/or spasticity of Grade 3 and above on the Modified Ashworth Scale. 3. Patients with the presence of a cardiac pacemaker were also excluded from the study. 4. Female patients who were pregnant at the time of data collection. 5. Patients enrolled in any other experimental rehabilitation programme or drug studies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)Timepoint: At the time of inclusion in the study and at the end of the two weeks of intervention.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)Timepoint: At the time of inclusion in the study and at the end of the two weeks of intervention.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactPriya Rajendra Pawar

SDM College of Physiotherapy

physiohealthindia@gmail.com9972189767

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026