Skip to content

Passing device from either side of tongue

Comparison of lateral insertion technique of ClassicTM laryngeal mask airway along right versus left border of tongue in adults

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/01/011370
Enrollment
128
Registered
2018-01-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- American Society of Anaesthesiologist Physical Status I and II

Interventions

Intervention1: Group R- Group right side: Patients in this group will have the ClassicTM LMA inserted with a partially inflated cuff (half the volume recommended by the manufacturer for that particula

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients scheduled for elective minor and intermediate duration surgery requiring general anaesthesia (lasting 15-120 minutes) ASA Physical Status 1 and 2 Modified Mallampati Class I and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients at risk of regurgitation or aspiration Patients with upper respiratory tract infection Patients with body mass index (BMI) >= 35kg/m2 Patients predicted to have difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
correct placement of LMA Time taken for LMA InsertionTimepoint: During LMA Insertion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
success rate of LMA placement Ease of LMA Insertion Timepoint: After LMA Insertion

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMadhu Rao

kasturba medical college, manipal university

rvenkateswaran@gmail.com9480575003

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026