Health Condition 1: null- ASA grade I, II patients. (b) Age group18yrs â?? 60 years (c) Anticipated difficult airway as assessed in PA assessment.
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: (a) ASA grade I, II patients (b) Age group18yrs â?? 60 years (c) Anticipated difficult airway as assessed in PA assessment
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: (a) Uncooperative patients. (b) Asthmatics/Epileptics (c) Deranged coagulation (d) Haemodynamic instability/Bradyarrythmias (e) Infection at the local site
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the time taken for intubation,by two methods of airway anaesthesia namely airway nerve blocks and topical spray-as-you-go technique for anaesthesia in the performance of awake nasotracheal intubation using flexible videoscope in anticipated difficult airway.Timepoint: 1)Time to vocal cord visualization 2)Time to tracheal intubation 3)Total time of nasotracheal intubation | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Haemodynamic variables at baseline and during the procedure bytwo methods of airway anaesthesia. . Timepoint: 1)Before intubation 2)At the time of intubation 3)After intubation | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactMaj Shayam Prakash Panjiyar
Armed Forces Medical College
Outcome results
None listed