FindTrial
Sign In

A comparison of two video laryngoscopes (C-MAC & KING VISION) during insertion of Endotracheal tube in patients with neck immobilisation.

A comparative evaluation of C-MAC Video laryngoscope and King Vision video laryngoscope in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization â?? A prospective randomized study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/01/011276
Enrollment
70
Registered
2018-01-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- for elective surgeries. ASA physical status I and II

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College Hospital
Lead Sponsor
Syed Moied Ahmed
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade I and II BMI MMP Class â?? Class 1 & 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Inter-incisor distance Thyro-mental distance Any Facial anomaly Fixed flexion deformity Risk of pulmonary aspiration Surgery requiring one lung ventilation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation time. POGO scoring. Timepoint: 2 years—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of attempts taken. Incidence of successful intubation. Ease of tracheal intubation. Hemodynamic responses (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) after laryngoscopy and intubation. Complications, if any. Timepoint: 2 years—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAjmal P M

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College Hospital

sma99@rediffmail.com9897454739

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026