FindTrial
Sign In

comparison of two types of ventilation modes given through ventilator after treating with surfactant (medicine)needed to breath easily in premature infants

Comparison of nasal continuous positive pressure versus nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants on the need for intubation in minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2018/01/011116
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-01-02
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Kasturba Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: will be selecting babies born at 28-32 weeks of gestation, presented with signs of respiratory distress (Tachypnea, flaring of nostrils, grunt and retractions)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Neonates requiring intubation in the delivery room. 2.Neonates with major congenital malformations. 3.Out born neonates.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours of life.Timepoint: 1. Need for intubation and mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours of life.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Duration of non- invasive ventilation. 2. Duration of invasive ventilation. 3. Duration of supplemental oxygenation. 4. Overall rate of intubation. 5. Incidence of pneumothorax. Timepoint: at any point of time within NICU stay—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMrudula M Sawadkar Dr Leslie Edward Lewis

Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104

leslielewis1@gmail.com9449208476

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026