Comparison of treatmentof gum problem associated with cervical abrasion using resin modified glass ionomer cement and palatal graft and palatal graft alone.

Comparison of treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesions using resin modified glass ionomer cement and connective tissue graft and connective tissue graft alone- A randomized controlled clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2017/12/010890

Enrollment

Registered

2017-12-14

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patients with isolated Millers Class I gingival recession associated with a non-carious cervical lesion 1-2 mm deep in maxillary canines or pre-molars,

Interventions

Intervention1: Coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft for treatment of Millers class I gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: coronally advanced flap with connec

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)Millers Class I gingival recession associated with a non-carious cervical lesion 1-2 mm deep in maxillary canines or pre-molars 2)Non -smoking adults more than 18 years of age. 3)Teeth with probing depth less than 3mm 4)Teeth with no radiographic signs of bone loss. 5)Patients with sufficient palatal donor tissue available for harvesting a connective tissue, 6)No previous periodontal surgery in the area

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1)Pregnant or lactating women, 2)Systemic disease affecting periodontal treatment outcome 3)Use of immunosuppressive agents, Patients on antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs in the past 3 months 4)Current and former smokers. Periodontal treatment in the past 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Primary variables were probing pocket depth, relative gingival recession, keratinized tissue width, keratinized tissue thickness, relative clinical attachment level, cervical lesion height, visual analogue pain score, maximum root coverageTimepoint: Measurements recorded at baseline, 1 month and 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
noneTimepoint: none	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGharat Mugdha Ranjankumar

KAHEs KLE V.K Institute of Dental Sciences

abhi.zing@gmail.com9886019181

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026