Skip to content

Comparison of three different teaching methods for deaf children in improving their oral health status

A Comparative Evaluation of Three Communication Techniques in Delivering Oral Health Education to 6-16 Year Old Children With Impaired Hearing

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/12/010839
Enrollment
360
Registered
2017-12-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- hearing impaired children

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Dr Richa
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children with partial or complete impaired hearing will be included Unilateral or bilateral impaired hearing will be included

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children with known systemic disease and uncooperative children who are not able t cope up with the examination procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Communication technique would be effective in implementing oral health education programme in hearing impaired children.Timepoint: Baseline evaluation 3 months evaluation 6 months evaluation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Change in Oral health status in Hearing Impaired Children 2. Change in KAP Questionnaire in school teachers/ respective class incharge. 3. Change in KAP Questionnaire in Hearing Impaired Children 4. Change in cariogenic activity in hearing impaired children Timepoint: 6months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ashima Goyal

PGIMER, Chandigarh

ashimapgi@yahoo.in09815067018

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026