Comparison of Insertion & Intubation Success of two different types laryngeal mask airways

COMPARISON OF INSERTION AND INTUBATION SUCCESS OF A NEW SECOND GENERATION SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE VERSUS INTUBATING LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY - SAD and ILMA

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2017/12/010817

Enrollment

120

Registered

2017-12-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA 1 and 2

Interventions

Intervention1: New second generation supraglottic airway device (Ambu Aura Gain): The AmbuÂ® AuraGainâ?¢ is a new single-use supraglottic airway device with gastric channel designed to facilitate intu

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia patients giving informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patientâ??s refusal. Mouth opening less than 2.5cm. Patients with poor lung compliance, cervical injury and Oropharyngeal pathology. Risk of regurgitation. Restricted neck movements. Thyromental distance less than 4cm.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. No of attempts at successful insertion of airway device and intubation. Timepoint: 15 min	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Oropharyngeal leak pressures. 3. Time taken for insertion and intubation 4. Adverse effects if any.Timepoint: 15 min	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sudheesh K

Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute

drsudhi@rediffmail.com9900134694

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026