Skip to content

A comparison between a new interdental wiring technique with currently used technique in the treatment of facial jaw fractures

A comparison between a novel intermaxillary fixation technique and Ivy eyelet intermaxillary fixation technique in the treatment of minimally displaced jaw fractures in terms of time taken, stability of IMF and incidence of glove perforation.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/12/010760
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-12-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Maxillofacial trauma patients who are otherwise healthy and not medically compromised

Interventions

Intervention1: Novel intermaxillary fixation technique: it is the new intermaxillary fixation technique to be used in the treatment of facial jaw fractures Control Intervention1: Ivy eyelet wiring tec

Sponsors

Dr Abdul Ahad G Khan
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Minimally displaced jaw fractures either maxilla and/or mandible screened clinically and confirmed radiographically by means of a digital OPG 2. Occlusion should be minimally disturbed/deranged 3. Favourable fractures 4. Multiple fractures with at least 3-4 teeth firmly fixed to basal bone in all fragments 5. Undisplaced Condylar fractures in which occlusion is minimally deranged that can be manipulated into satisfactory occlusion under local anesthesia manually 6. Zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures not requiring open reduction/ fixation 7. Jaw fractures with good proximal contacts between the teeth 8. Healthy patients free from medical compromise such as diabetes, hypertension, B asthma, Epilepsy, drug allergies etc

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unfavourable fractures 2. Fractures with grossly deranged occlusion 3. Mixed dentition period for need of good dento-alveolar support 4. Comminuted jaw fractures 5. Dento-alveolar fractures 6. Displaced condylar fractures requiring open reduction internal fixation 7. Partially/ totally edentulous jaw fractures 8. Jaw fractures with open proximal contacts between the teeth 9. Medical problems such as bronchial asthma, epilepsy that preclude IMF 10. Oral mucosal conditions that pose significant restrictions on operators maneuverability such as oral submucous fibrosis .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the new intermaxillary fixation wiring technique with eyelet wiring for intermaxillary fixation of jaw fractures based on: 1. Time duration required for application of IMF in minutes measured from the point in time when the first wire placement is started to the finished tucking of IMF wires interdentally Timepoint: Measured at the time of intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Stability of IMF over the treatment span assessed by maintenance/ loosening of IMF wires 2. Incidence of glove perforation assessed by glove inflation by water post intervention Timepoint: Stability of IMF is assessed on a weekly basis post intervention. Glove perforation is assessed immediately post intervention

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Abdul Ahad G Khan

Govt Dental College and Hospital Aurangabad

drabdulahadkhan@gmail.com9552002731

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026