FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of blind versus USG guided spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients posted for truma surgery

Prospective observational study of Comparison of anatomical landmark guided midline versus pre-procedure ultrasound-guided midline technique of spinal anesthesia in elderly patients for orthopedic surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/11/010567
Enrollment
62
Registered
2017-11-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- To study of difficulty in spinal anaesthesia patients posted for orthopedic surgeru of age more than 65 and ASAI-III

Interventions

Control Intervention1: In this prospective study different factors to compare spinal anesthesia are studied: The factors compared in blind and USG group are number of attempts(defined as the number o

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesia
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade I-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age of the patient less than 65year ASA IV and V Bleeding tendency and Coagulopathy Local infection at spine Allergy to local anesthetics Spinal deformity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The number of attempts and passes of spinal needle insertion.Timepoint: Outcomes were assessed while giving spinal anaesthesia—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Any complication like bloddy tap,patients discomfortTimepoint: Factors were assessed while giving spinal anesthesia and 24 hours after spinal anaesthesia.—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Deepa Kane

Seth G S Medical college and Kem Hospital

deepakane_22@yahoo.com9619313331

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026