FindTrial
Sign In

A study on use of videolaryngoscope and conventional laryngoscope for insertion of endotracheal tube in mannequin by medical students

Comparison of video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in airway novices.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/11/010491
Enrollment
106
Registered
2017-11-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Group 2 VL Videolaryngoscope: A Kingvision Videolaryngoscope with 3 sized blade will be used by the participants for endotracheal intubation on mannequin Control Intervention1: Group 1

Sponsors

Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All interns posted in department of anaesthesiology

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: MBBS interns who have performed 5 or more laryngoscopy or intubations MBBS interns not willing to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The trial will end when the student either the participant successfully passes the ETT into the trachea or the 300 second time limit reached.Timepoint: 300 seconds—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 Esophageal intubation 2 Excessive pressure on teeth 3 Comparison of ease of use between the devicesTimepoint: 300 seconds—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vinayak P S

Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals

drvinayak_ps@yahoo.co.in08040502860

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026