Skip to content

study to compare different techniques of laryngeal mask airway in children

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF CLASSIC LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY INSERTION (ROTATIONAL, LATERAL AND MIDLINE) IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS: A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/11/010365
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-11-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- paediatric patients aged 1-6 years, ASA 1 or 2

Interventions

Intervention1: midline technique of cLMA insertion: cLMA is inserted with cuff partially inflated using the midline technique along the hard palate Intervention2: lateral technique of cLMA insertion:

Sponsors

PGIMS Rohtak
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: scheduled to undergo short elective surgical procedure up to 40 minutes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients having 1. upper respiratory tract infection 2. restricted mouth opening 3. congenital heart disease 4. risk of aspiration 5. duration of surgery more than 40 minutes -position other than supine.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ease of insertionTimepoint: easy, difficult, faliure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
time of insertion, fibreoptic grading, haemodynamic parameters, complicationsTimepoint: in seconds, grade 1-4, haemodynamic parameters at 0, 1, 5, 10 minutes

Countries

India

Contacts

Public Contactneha hasija

PGIMS, Rohtak

nanditakad@yahoo.com09896335544

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026