Skip to content

Use of Osteo-perforations for faster Maxillary Canine retraction.

Effects of Trans Mucosal Micro Osteo-perforations on the rate of Maxillary Canine retraction : A Split mouth Randomized clinical study - EMOMCR

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/10/010290
Enrollment
18
Registered
2017-10-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- class II division 1 malocclusion

Interventions

Intervention1: transmucosal micro-osteo perforations: The experimental side â?? This half received six MOPs, three MOPs mesial and three MOPs distal to canine(in a vertical line) by self-drilling m

Sponsors

sachin parashar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with class II div.1 malocclusion requiring bilateral extraction of maxillary first premolars. 2. Overjet of less than 10mm. 3. No debilitating systemic disease. 4. No radiographic evidence of bone loss. 5. No history of periodontal disease/ therapy. 6. No smoking habit. 7. No gingivitis or untreated caries.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.overjet more than 10mm 2. Presence of any signs and symptoms of gingival and periodontal diseases. 3. History of Long-term medication 4. Systemic diseases. 5. Evidence of bone loss. 6. Smoking habit. 7. Any carious Lesions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The rate of canine movement was 66% or 1.66times and 32% or 1.3 times faster in experimental side during first four and eighth week respectively, as compared to the control side.Timepoint: The rate of canine movement was 66% or 1.66times and 32% or 1.3 times faster in experimental side during first four and eighth week respectively, as compared to the control side.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.There is minimal root resorption and marginal bone loss. 2.The difference in the level of pain, ease and satisfaction with the procedure seems insignificant between the MOP assisted and conventional orthodontics. Timepoint: 0,4,8,12,16th weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr SACHIN PARASHAR

University of health sciences (UHSR), rohtak

rajsringari@gmail.com9999362277

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026