FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing adequacy of samples obtained during bronchoscopic needle aspiration with different suction pressures (0ml,10ml and 20ml) in a random order

Comparison of sample adequacy of Endobronchial Ultrasound guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration using 0ml, 10ml and 20ml suction pressures - A Randomized control study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/10/010202
Enrollment
330
Registered
2017-10-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patients having Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

Interventions

Intervention1: 0ml, 10ml and 20 ml suction pressures: One Mediastinal Lymph nodes per patient will be sampled with either 0ml, 10ml or 20 ml suction pressure as per computer generated random suction p

Sponsors

nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients with mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy with Lymph Node size greater than 0.5cm in short axis (2)Patients willing to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients having contraindications to undergo EBUS (IHD, MI, uncontrolled HTN, deranged coagulation profile)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the adequacy of the EBUS TBNA aspirates obtained with 0 ml, 10 ml and 20 ml suction pressuresTimepoint: 6 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
(1)To compare the diagnostic yield of the EBUS TBNA aspirates obtained with 0 ml, 10 ml and 20 ml suction pressures (2)To assess the effect of various lymph node characteristics on the adequacy and diagnostic yield of the EBUS TBNA aspirates with each of the suction pressure used Timepoint: 6months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Iyer Hariharan NR NH Ramaswamy

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

anantmohan@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026