FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of various methods of measurement of inferior vena cava diameter using ultrasound in order to determine the most accurate method.

Comparison of inter-rater reliability between subxiphoid and transhepatic view in measurement of inferior vena cava diameter using point-of-care ultrasound

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/10/010092
Enrollment
45
Registered
2017-10-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Adult patients in Critical Care Unit of JIPMER with central venous catheter and under mechanical ventilation

Interventions

Control Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

JIPMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patients admitted in Critical Care Unit of JIPMER with central venous catheter and under mechanical ventilation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Lack of access to subxiphoid region or right lateral side of chest wall and patients with pneumothorax on right side

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Largest diameter of IVC Smallest diameter of IVCTimepoint: During CCU stay under mechanical ventilation, with central venous catheter and hemodynamically stable—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Inter-rater reliability between subxiphoid and transhepatic view in measurement of inferior vena cava diameterTimepoint: On completion of measurements by both observers—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Priyanka Sharma

JIPMER

jipmervasu@gmail.com9894444102

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026