Skip to content

comparing two methods of treatment of ingrown toe nails: removing part of the nail and using phenol to destroy the nail origin versus removing part of the nail and surgically removing the nail origin

Surgical matricectomy vs phenolisation after lateral nail plate avulsion in the treatment of ingrown toenails: single blinded randomised control trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/09/009951
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-09-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Ingrown toenails with stage I disease showing recurrence with conservative management. Patients with ingrown toenails with stage II and III disease

Interventions

Intervention1: Lateral nail plate avulsion with surgical matricecetomy: Lateral part of the nail plate which is impinging on the soft tissue is avulsed. An incision is made proximally passing through

Sponsors

Department of Dermatology JIPMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with ingrown toenails attending skin OPD with stage I disease( any age, both males and females), symptomatic and showing recurrence with conservative management. 2. Patients ( any age, both males and females) with ingrown toenails attending skin OPD with stage II and III disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with peripheral vascular disease, Raynauds phenomenon, systemic sclerosis or with any other contraindications to use of local anesthetic with vasoconstrictors. 2. Patients with co morbidities like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension and patients on long term steroids or onimmunosuppressant. 3. Patients having allergy or sensitivity to phenol or history of prolonged wound healing with phenol use. 4. Patients allergic to lignocaine.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrence of symptoms (in 6 month follow up), time period in which recurrence occursTimepoint: 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Visual analogue scale for pain before and after procedure(baseline , 7 days, 1month, 6months) 2. Time taken for pain relief (number of days in which the patient resumes daily/routine activities and work) 3. Requirement of adjunctive treatment(additional OPD visits if any and why) 4. Nail morphology post treatment: descriptive and photograph Timepoint: baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rashmi Kumari

JIPMER

rashmi.sreerag@gmail.com9489692199

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026