FindTrial
Sign In

To compare two methods for making hand pain free before operation

Comparison between two approaches for ultrasound guided infraclavicular block in upper limb surgeries

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/09/009756
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-09-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- HEALTHY ASA I/II

Interventions

Intervention1: retroclavicular approach: retroclavicular approach of needle placement Control Intervention1: classical approach: classical approach of needle placement

Sponsors

AIIMS Patna
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA I/ II undergoing upper limb surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: age less than 18 years, 2. inability to provide informed written consent, 4. refusal of regional anesthesia, 5. Contraindications to regional anesthesia (local skin infection, coagulopathy, shoulder or upper chest deformity, 6. severe respiratory disease,

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
visibility of the block needleTimepoint: 0 minutes(at the time of block)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.needling time 2. axillary artery depth 3 operator satisfaction: 4. surgeons satisfaction 5. block success:Timepoint: 1. at the time of block 2.at the time of block 3. at the end of procedure 4. at the end of procedure 5.30 minutes after procedure—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Chandni Sinha

Department of Anaesthesia, AIIMS

chandni.doc@gmail.com7250333148

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026