FindTrial
Sign In

Comparision of two supraglottic airway devices ( I-Gel and PLMA) for pediatric anaesthesia

Comparision of I-GELTM and LMA-PROSEALTM for airway management in pediatrics patients under controlled ventilation.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/09/009705
Enrollment
64
Registered
2017-09-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Age 3-9 Yrs. Children OF Either Sex Weight 10-30 Kg. Children Of ASA-I& II Patient With MALLAMPATTI Grading I&II

Interventions

Intervention1: I-GEL: Supraglottic device Control Intervention1: Proseal LMA: Supraglottic device

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesia
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Weight 10-30 Kg. 2.ASA I&II 3.MALLAMPATTI grading I & II 4.Undergoing elective pediatric surgery with duration of 1-2 Hrs. 5.Elective lower abdominal,urogenital and orthopedic surgeries.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with recent upper respiratory tract symptoms 2.Patient with risk factor for difficult airway 3.Patient with any known pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases 4.Patient with increase risk of gastro esophageal regurgitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oropharyngeal leak pressureTimepoint: 5 minutes after establishing airway—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Inspired tidal volume Expired tidal volumeTimepoint: Post insertion after 20 minutes—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrMamta G Patel

Medical College Baroda

mgpatel111@yahoo.com9825453024

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026