Skip to content

Comparison of three commonly used supraglottic devices for their efficacy

A comparative evaluation of proseal laryngeal mask airway,I-gel and supreme laryngeal mask airway in anesthetised paralysed adult patients undergoing elective surgery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/08/009534
Enrollment
84
Registered
2017-08-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- undergoing elective surgery

Interventions

Intervention1: nil: nil Control Intervention1: nil: nil

Sponsors

Department of anesthesia
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade 1 OR 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Known or predicted difficult airway ,full stomach or increased risk of aspiration (GERD, pregnancy, hiatus hernia)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Oropharyngeal leak pressureTimepoint: 1 min, 15 min

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
time of insertion,ease of insertion, hemodynamic response and morbidity associatedTimepoint: till 30 min of surgery

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAnisha singh

maulana azad medical college

drakgk@yahoo.co.in09968604219

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026