Endoscopic assessment of Conventional Adenoidectomy

Endoscopic evaluation of conventional adenoidectomy - EECA

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2017/08/009458

Enrollment

Registered

2017-08-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- enlarged adenoids in pediatric age group causing snoring mouth breathing , nasal obstructive symptoms , otitis media

Interventions

Intervention1: endoscopic group: conventional adenoidectomy follwoed my endoscopic assited clearance of residual if any and follow up after 6 and 12 weeks Control Intervention1: conventional method:

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients between 3 and 15 years with enlarged adenoids with or without tonsillar enlargement, with or without middle ear effusion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Nasal obstruction secondary severe deviated nasal septum/inferior turbinates enlarged both sides. 2. Associated congenital anatomical malformations and medical co- morbidities. 3. Patients prescribed corticosteroid nasal spray.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To determine if endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy is superior to conventional adenoidectomy.Timepoint: september 2017	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
How much excision should be done to define a successful clearance?Timepoint: grading of adenoids endoscopically	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Paresh Naik

Pondicherry Institute Of Medical Sciences

kurien123.mary@gmail.com9442545487

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026