Skip to content

Comparative study of healing after periapical surgery BY ULTRASOUND using platelet rich fibrin.

Healing in surgical endodontics with and without the use of PRF: evaluated by color power doppler ultrasonography.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/08/009415
Enrollment
26
Registered
2017-08-18
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patients with periapical pathology in maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth region.

Interventions

Intervention1: WITH PRF: IN ONE GROUP PRF WAS PLACED IN THE BONY DEFECT AFTER SURGICAL EXCISION OF THE LESION AND IN THE OTHER GROUP NO PRF WAS PLACED. HEALING WAS COMPARATIVELY STUDIED IN BOTH THE GR

Sponsors

Himachal Pradesh Government Dental College and Hospital Shimla
Lead Sponsor
sanjeev chauhan
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.The patients with no general medical contraindications for oral surgical procedures. 2.The patients with only maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth that required periradicular surgery. 3.The minimum diameter of the bone defect, as determined from periapical radiographs, to be at least 6 mm. 4.The nonsurgical re-treatment is judged unfeasible or had previously failed. 5.The apical root canal to be devoid of the presence of a post for at least 6 mm. 6. No spontaneous pain or swelling should have been present.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: presence of any kind of pathosis associated with vertical root fracture; perforation of the furcation area or lateral canal walls; moderate to severe periodontal bone loss, detected with a periodontal probe (probing depth greater than 5 mm). Patients with neuropsychiatric disorders were also be excluded. Any general condition of patient contraindicated for surgical treatment under local anaesthesia. Age less than 21 yrs and more than 35 years were also excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Platelet rich fibrin showed better healing of the surgical defect then the non platelet rich fibringroup.Timepoint: Healing in Platelet rich fibrin group was better then the non platelet rich fibrin group at 1,3 and 9 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in healing was not significant at 1 month but the difference was significant at 3 and 6 months.Timepoint: Significant difference in healing at 3 and 6 months.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr SANJEEV CHAUHAN

H.P.G.D.C. Shimla h.p.

guptaashumoni@gmail.com9418470020

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026