FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two medical devices for inserting tube in the windpipe in a difficult situation.

A comparative evaluation of two Videolaryngoscopes as an intubation Aid in a simulated difficult airway: a prospective randomized study - none

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/08/009380
Enrollment
106
Registered
2017-08-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patients aged 18 to 60 years, of either gender, ASA physical status I or II, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation

Interventions

Intervention1: Endotracheal intubation using McGrath Mac video laryngoscope: In this group first laryngoscopy will be performed using King Vision video laryngoscope
laryngoscopic view obtained will be graded and time taken to obtain optimal laryngoscopic view noted. The patient will be ventilated with 100% oxygen before laryngoscopy with the second device. The M
laryngoscopic view obtained will be graded and time taken to obtain optimal laryngoscopic view noted. The patient will be ventilated with 100% oxygen before laryngoscopy with the second device. The Ki

Sponsors

Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The study will be performed in adult patients, aged 18 to 60 years, of either gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status grade I or II, undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring oro-tracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with known or anticipated difficult airway (modified Mallampati class 3 or 4, thyromental distance Patients with oral or laryngeal pathology, cervical spine injury or disease, obesity, cardiovascular or respiratory disease, loose or absent front dentition, risk factors for gastric aspiration such as pregnancy, diabetes, etc.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
First attempt intubation successTimepoint: 180 seconds from the time of insertion of laryngoscope blade between the incisors—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Laryngeal view obtained during laryngoscopy, time taken to obtain optimal laryngoscopic view, time taken for endotracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, ease of intubation, haemodynamic parameters and complications if any.Timepoint: 180 seconds from the time of insertion of laryngoscope blade between the incisors—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anupma Taluja

Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

ajayannu@gmail.com9718990114

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026