FindTrial
Sign In

effect of fixing material on health of gums in implant restorations

Influence of gingival collar height and type of luting cement on the amount of residual excess cement(REC) in implant restorations: A clinical study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/08/009323
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-08-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: Implant placement and cementation of prosthesis using three different types of cements: SUBGROUP A: Prosthesis cemented by resin cement. SUBGROUP B: Prosthesis cemented by glass ionome

Sponsors

Sameera Koodakkadavath
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy Patients willing to participate in the study undergoing treatment for implant supported cement retained prosthesis. 2. Cases with sufficient osseointegration of implant. 3. Partially edentulous maxillary or mandibular arches.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Cases in which implants failed to get osseointegrated. 2. Cases with inflammed gingival tissue around implants.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the amount of residual excess cement(REC) left undetected in implant restorations with different gingival collar height and to compare this with different types of implant luting cements.Timepoint: 18 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the effect of different gingival collar height and type of luting cement in formation of residual excess cement (REC).Timepoint: 18 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pramod Kumar A V

Govt Dental college

pramodav@hotmail.com9447169055

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026