FindTrial
Sign In

Effect of Microcurrent compared with Low level laser therapy for patients with diabetic foot ulcer

Efficacy of Microcurrent Therapy Versus Low Level Laser therapy in treating diabetic foot ulcer

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/08/009310
Enrollment
90
Registered
2017-08-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Patients with diabetic foot ulcer

Interventions

Intervention1: Micro Current Therapy: Microcurrent therapy is sometimes called â??microcurrent electrical neuromuscular stimulationâ?? (MENS) or more accurately, â??low-voltage pulsed micro-amperage s

Sponsors

Saveetha College of Physiotherapy
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Type II Diabetes Mellitus 2.Wagner grade 2 diabetic foot ulcers 3.Non infected wound 4.Both the gender

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Ischemia 2.Infection 3.Ulcers other that diabetic foot ulcers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Size of the wound measured by Acetate Tracing MethodTimepoint: Calculated by Wound Circumference—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of life is assessed by diabetic foot ulcer questionerTimepoint: Sum of all values;Tissue Biopsy for change in the tissueTimepoint: Mostly calculated by cell counts or percentage of changes in cell growth—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactM Kamalakannan

Saveetha College of Physiotherapy

kamalakannan.scpt@saveetha.com9600004487

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026