Skip to content

Assessing and comparing efficacy of cyclosporine versus azathioprine in CRU

A randomized study to assess and compare the efficacy of cyclosporine versus azathioprine in the treatment of chronic refractory urticaria.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/08/009213
Enrollment
56
Registered
2017-08-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Satisfactory

Interventions

Intervention1: Group A (cyclosporine) & group B (azathioprine): Patients will be randomized into two groups A and B using computer generated random number tables, group A will receive Cyclosporine and
wherein, 28 random single and double-digit numbers from 1-56 will be selected before recruitment, and patients coming on these numbers will be randomized in a particular group. Random number generatio

Sponsors

Nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: chronic spontaneous urticaria, with disease duration of at least 6 months or above, which is not controlled with four fold increased dosage of antihistamines (as per EAACI guidelines), given for at least three consecutive months and requiring repeated courses of oral corticosteroids. There is no strict number of oral corticosteroids intake courses before the patient can be labeled as chronic refractory urticaria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients giving history of fainting, bronchospasm during previous attacks of urticaria that is suggestive of anaphylaxis. 2. Urticaria 3. Age 4. Physical and pressure urticaria. 5. Urticarial vasculitits. 6. Pregnant and lactating patients. 7. Cataract, hepatic or renal diseases, severe infections,poorly controlled hypertension 8. Concomitant intake of drugs like nephrotoxic drugs (gentamycin, vancomycin, amphotericin-B, indomethacin, diclofenac, H2 antihistamines like ranitidine, cimetidine, phenobarbitone, rifampicin, allupurinol, febuxostat). 9. History suggestive of allergy to azathioprine , cyclosporine. 10. Absolute contraindications69 of azathioprine are severe infections, severly impaired hepatic or bone marrow function, pancreatitis, live vaccines, pregnancy and lactation. 11. Patients with chronic kidney disease, uncontrolled hypertension, renal insufficiency, uncontrolled infections, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, including mycosis fungoides, should not be given Cyclosporine70. 12. Patients who are planning pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in urticaria activity score (UAS7) i.e decrease more than 75% from. baseline to week 12 (at end of treatment) within group A and B and comparison between corresponding groups. Timepoint: From baseline to the week 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
a. Change in outcome scoring scale (OSS) from baseline to week 12 within group A and B. b. Change in UAS7 and OSS from baseline to week 24 (end of follow-up) within group A and B. c. Change in ASST, APST, IgE levels from baseline to week 12 within group A and B. d. Comparison for the above mentioned parameters between group A and B. Timepoint: 24 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Yashdeep singh pathania

Pgimer chandigarh

drsen_2000@yahoo.com8894480089

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026