FindTrial
Sign In

The bar length of foot abduction brace used in treatment of clubfeet

Effect of bar length on foot abduction, pronation and ankle dorsiflexion in Steenbeek foot abduction brace â?? a pilot study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/07/009096
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-07-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Treated clubfeet with Ponseti method

Interventions

Intervention1: Steenbeek foot abduction brace: Different bar lengths for the above brace

Sponsors

Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Both unilateral and bilateral clubfeet treated with Ponseti Method

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Any pathology in lower limbs affecting hip, knee, ankle or foot range of motion 2. Limb length discrepancy due to any reason

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To measure the effect of bar length of the Steenbeek foot abduction brace on the abduction of foot. 2. To measure the effect of bar length of the Steenbeek foot abduction brace on the pronation of foot. 3. To measure the effect of bar length of the Steenbeek foot abduction brace on the dorsiflexion of ankle joint. Timepoint: Till sample size is reached—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Overall impact of changes in bar length for dorsiflexion, foot abduction and pronation for deriving a correlation between them. 2. The bar length will be compared with the shoulder width for the Indian population. Timepoint: Till sample size is reached—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anil Agarwal

CHACHA NEHRU BAL CHIKITSALAYA

anilrachna@gmail.com9643308233

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026