Skip to content

Comparison of Airtraq and Kingvision videolaryngoscope for intubation in adults.

A comparative evaluation of two videolaryngoscopes (The Airtraq and Kingvision) as an intubating aid in adult patients.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/06/008940
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-06-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Age:18-60 yrs. Weight: 40-70kg of either sex. Mallampatti grade I & II Mouth opening 20mm ASA I & II Posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia and intubation

Interventions

Intervention1: Airtraq videolaryngoscope: After inducing the patient with Inj Propofol and proper relaxation with Inj Succinyl Choline, endotracheal intubation was done using Airtraq videolayngoscope

Sponsors

S S G Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient willing to participate in study group. Patients posted for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia and Endotracheal Intubation for planned surgery. Age:18-60 yrs. Weight: 40-70kg of either sex. Mallampatti grade I & II Mouth opening >20mm ASA I & II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Cervical spine disorder Thyromental distance less than 6cm Stern mental distance less than 12 cm Neck circumference more than 42cm Obesity (BMI >= 30) Pregnant patients Known case of GERD Oropharyngeal pathology Emergency surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare Airtraq and King vision in terms of following parameters- 1. Time of video laryngoscopy: Time taken from introduction of Video laryngoscope to view of glottis. (T1) 2. Time of tube insertion: Time taken from view of glottis to insertion of endotracheal tube and confirmation by CAPNOGRAPHY. (T2) 3. Total duration of intubation (T1+T2) 4. No. of attempts of Video laryngoscope insertion 5. Quality of visualization of Glottic aperture Timepoint: Time of videolaryngoscopy. tube insertion and intubation in Seconds Vitals at 0,5,10 and 15 min

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Optimization maneuvers required for intubation 2. Vital parameters 3. Incidence of airway trauma and complications. Timepoint: Score - 0,1,2,3 Baseline, 5, 10, 15 and postopratively

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shweta

Govt Medical college Vadodara

devyani.dr@gmail.com9909983168

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026