FindTrial
Sign In

comparing two methods of providing pain relief after surgery

Comparison of continuous epidural analgesia with continuous local wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy-a randomized controlled study.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/06/008798
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-06-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- patients posted for total abdominal hysterectomy in JIPMER

Interventions

Intervention1: group-L: patients post op analgesia provided with local wound infiltration catheter Control Intervention1: group E: patients postop analgesia provided with epidural

Sponsors

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA1 or ASA2 status 2. patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients with contra indication to regional anesthesia, allergy to local anesthetics, unwilling for study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
post operative pain assessment using VAS scoresTimepoint: 24 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
comparison of hemodynamics, opioid consumption, opioid side effects, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction scoreTimepoint: 24 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Chitra Rajeswari T

Jawaharlal Institute of Post graduate Medical Education and Research

dr.chitrarajeswari@gmail.com9487087311

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026