FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing three different root canal filling methods in milk teeth

Comparative Evaluation of Three Obturating Techniques in Primary Molars- An in vivo study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/06/008749
Enrollment
36
Registered
2017-06-05
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Teeth indicated for pulpectomy

Interventions

Intervention1: 1.NaviTip® 2.NaviTip®: 1.Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, Utah, USA- zinc oxide eugenol will be used as the obturating material in the powder liquid ratio of 1:3. 2.Double Side

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.All the teeth indicated for pulpectomy 2. Parents who have signed the informed consent form 3. Children who have signed the assent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Children with known allergy to zinc oxide eugenol 2. Medically compromised children 3. Physiologic root resorption greater than half of the root length

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical sucess, Radiographic successTimepoint: Immediately after the treatment ( 1 hour )—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Radiographic success, clinical successTimepoint: 1 hour—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Arathi Rao

Manipal College of Dental Sciences

arathi.rao@manipal.edu9845242079

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026