Health Condition 1: null- patients with symptomatic cholecystitis
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: comparison of intubating laryngeal tube and intubating I gel for securing airway: the airway is secured using either intubating Laryngeal tube or Intubating I gel and the endotracheal i
Sponsors
Dr Rajendra Prasad Govt Medical College
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: ASA physical class 1 and 2 patients posted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with head injury, Psychiatric disorder Respiratory tract pathology Endocrine disorder Predicted difficult airway such as mouth opening less than 2 cm ï?? Modified Mallampati scale class 3 and 4 ï?? BMI >35kg/m2) ï?? Patient having gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hiatus hernia and pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Primary outcome is difference in time to ventilate using both supraglottic airway device â?? I- Gel and ILTDS. Secondary outcome will be difference in time to tracheal ventilation,and no. of attempts to tracheal intubation.Timepoint: one time, at the time of induction of Anaesthesia | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary outcome will be difference in time to tracheal ventilation,and no. of attempts to tracheal intubation.Timepoint: one time, at the time of ntubation | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactUsha Kumari Chaudhary
Dr. Rajendra Prasad Govt. Medical College,Tanda, Kangra
Outcome results
None listed