Skip to content

Study to see if Periosteal membrane is a better clinical choice than available collagen membrane in the management of Grade II furcation involved teeth

Comparison of periosteal membrane with commercially available collagen membrane in the treatment of mandibular Grade II furcation defect: A split mouth study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/04/008327
Enrollment
10
Registered
2017-04-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Grade II furcation defect in permanent mandibular molars

Interventions

Intervention1: periosteal membrane: harvested from palate of same subject in which treatment was to be done Control Intervention1: Resorbable Collagen membrane: commercially available

Sponsors

shivesh mishra
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patient suffering from Chronic Periodontitis as per AAP 1999 classification. 2.Patients having clinically Grade II furcation involvement of mandibular molars diagnosed clinically as per Glickmanâ??s classification.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with known systemic disease and conditions known to predispose to periodontal diseases 2.Pregnant & lactating mothers Patients with deleterious habits like smoking, alcohol consumption , tobacco chewing , beetle nut chewing etc. Patients with Teeth with Grade III mobility as per Millerâ??s classification Teeth with Grade I, Grade III and Grade IV furcation involvement Periodontal treatment within previous 12 months Use of antibiotics within previous 6 months Use of hormonal contraceptives Use of Anti-inflammatory drugs within the past 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Horizontal furcation measurement and radiographic bone defect levelTimepoint: baseline and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical probing depth, clinical attachment level, plaque index, gingival indexTimepoint: baseline and 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shivesh Kumar Mishra

I.T.S Dental College, Hospital and Research Centre, Greater Noida

drshivjot74@gmail.com9811787808

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026