FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparative study of two types of stretching techniques on range of motion and functional activities in frozen shoulder condition

A Comparative study of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and capsular stretching on range of motion and functional activities in frozen shoulder

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/04/008321
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-04-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- Frozen Shoulder Subjects

Interventions

Intervention1: Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching: D2 proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching will be given in flexion and extension pattern .The stretch will be given f

Sponsors

Samuel dickson philip
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Unilateral frozen shoulder ,Frozen shoulder individuals with limited range of motioncfor shoulder abduction, external rotation and flexion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any recent shoulder surgery,Rheumatoid arthritis,Any recent history for fracture around shoulder complex,Subjects with rotator cuff tear

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
universal goniometer, Shoulder pain and disability indexTimepoint: Difference in Range of motion and functional activities after two weeks of intervention—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Visual analogue scale Timepoint: Difference in pain after two weeks of intervention—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSamuel dickson philip

Father muller medical college

sudeep_pais@hotmail.com09739867404

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026