FindTrial
Sign In

comparing success of putting artificial tube in windpipe by using a thin wire or a thick introducer for guidance

Comparison of success of intubation and laryngeal morbidity in Bougie versus Wire guided intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2017/02/007968
Enrollment
104
Registered
2017-02-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: null- ASA I&II physical status

Interventions

Intervention1: wire guided intubation: To compare success of intubation and laryngeal morbidity in bougie versus wire guided intubation Control Intervention1: bougie guided intubation: To compare succ

Sponsors

JIPMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: i. Adults ASA 1-2 ii. Age 20-65 years undergoing surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: i. patients planned for awake fibreoptic intubation ,nasal intubation, ii. Rapid sequence induction. iii. Patients undergoing surgery in prone position or neck surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare success of intubation and laryngeal morbidity in bougieversus wire guided intubationTimepoint: preoperative and within 24 hrs of extubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare hemodynamic stress response and difficulty in railroading the tube in bougie versus wire guided intubation .Timepoint: intraoperative only—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Priya Rudingwa

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical education and Research, (JIPMER)

drthooyamani200888@gmail.com9941032921

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026